Legal Opinion

Backus v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1882PublishedCited by 38 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Detroit. Injunction bill. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

Complainant is owner of lots numbered 31 to 36 inclusive, on a subdivision of part of the Loranger farm, south of Fort street in the city of Detroit, being part of private claims 338 and 474. The subdivision was made by a plat duly executed July 24, 1863, by Bosalie Loranger, *111then the owner, through whose conveyance complainant derives title. ■ The lots all front on the Detroit river, and appear from the plat to be bounded upon it. Between lots 33 and 3d the plat shows a street 30 feet in width extending to the river. In front of lots 34, 35 and 36 complainant has ■constructed a wharf two…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. President of Cincinnati v. Lessee of WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  2. Barney v. KeokukSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Barclay v. Richard W. Howell's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  4. Stewart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  5. Lorman v. BensonMichigan Supreme Court · 1860

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Village of Pewaukee v. SavoyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Thies v. HowlandMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  3. McCardel v. SmolenMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  4. 2000 Baum Family Trust v. BabelMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
  5. McCloskey v. Pacific Coast Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1908

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API