Legal Opinion
Stash v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 29, 2010No. 18534, 18535PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
The plaintiffs in each of these consolidated appeals, Adam Stash and James R. Marsh III, 1 commenced administrative appeals in the trial court challenging the decisions 2 of the defendant, the commissioner of motor vehicles, to suspend their motor vehicle operator’s licenses (license) for ninety days after Stash and Marsh each failed a test utilized to detect the presence of alcohol in a subject’s blood. General Statutes § 14-227b (e). 3 Following separate hearings on each matter, the trial court upheld the decisions of the defendant and dismissed the plaintiffs’ appeals. 4 The…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- Schallenkamp v. DelPonteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Norfolk & Dedham Mutual Fire Insurance v. WysockiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Morrissey v. Yale UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Schallenkamp v. DelponteConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Stebbins v. Doncasters, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- McCoy v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Ives v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- McCoy v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- State v. MosbackConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015