Legal Opinion

Stash v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided December 23, 2008No. File HHB CV-06-4010751, HHB CV-06-4010117, HHB CV-06-4011752, HHB CV-07-4014305PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HON. GEORGE LEVINE, JUDGE TRIAL REFEREE.

I

INTRODUCTION

Driving a motor vehicle while under the influence can have criminal consequences under General Statutes § 14-227a (hereinafter the criminal statute), and/or administrative consequences under General Statutes § 14-227b (hereinafter the per se statute). As described below, the criminal statute and the per se statute interrelate in regard to the captioned matters.

Each of these matters is an appeal from a final decision of the defendant, the commissioner of motor vehicles, suspending the operator’s license (license) of one of the plaintiffs 1…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Goldstar Medical Services, Inc. v. Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  2. State v. PilottiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  3. Giglio v. American Economy InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  4. State v. TietjenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Medevac MidAtlantic, LLC v. Keystone Mercy Health PlanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Stash v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API