Legal Opinion

State v. Hood

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 4, 2008No. AC 27586PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GRUENDEL, J.

The defendant, James Russell Hood, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or drugs in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 2003) § 14-227U. The defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) admitted into evidence the breath test results from the Intoxilyzer 5000 because they were not in compliance with regulations and statutes and because the court failed to hold a Porter hearing 2 to ascertain the reliability of the Intoxilyzer 5000 test results, (2)…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Connecticut v. PorterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  2. State v. MungrooConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  3. State v. PulaskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  4. State v. BarberConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  5. State v. PilottiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. BeebeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  2. State v. BrownConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  3. State v. BonillaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2015
  4. State v. HoodSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  5. State v. HoodSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API