Legal Opinion

Baum v. City of St. Louis

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 20, 1938PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This suit was filed by respondent, plaintiff below, as a citizen and taxpayer of the city of St. Louis, against the city, the election commissioners of the city and the treasurer and comptroller of the city to enjoin the holding of an election threatened to be called for the purpose of voting on two ordinances proposed under the initiative provisions of the city charter. A number of taxpayers of said city filed a petition seeking to intervene in the suit as defendants. This petition was granted. The trial court entered a judgment in plaintiff's favor enjoining the defendants, election…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Attorney General v. CunningamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Hurst v. City of BurlingameCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Hopping v. Council of City of RichmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Long v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  5. State v. ButlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Smith v. Township of LivingstonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
  2. Dewey v. Doxey-Layton Realty Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Schweig v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. State Ex Rel. Powers v. DonohueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  5. Otey v. Common Council of City of MilwaukeeDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1968

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API