Legal Opinion

Schweig v. City of St. Louis

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 16, 1978No. 38564PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEIER, Judge.

Plaintiffs filed suit for declaratory judgment to contest the validity and enjoin the enforcement of two ordinances of the City of St. Louis. One ordinance declared a certain area of the city “blighted” and the other approved a redevelopment plan for the area. These ordinances were passed pursuant to the “Urban Redevelopment Corporations Law,” Chapter 353 RSMo. 1969. The trial court dismissed plaintiffs’ second amended petition on the grounds that plaintiffs had no standing to challenge the ordinances and that the petition failed to state a claim upon which relief could be…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Concerned Parents v. Caruthersville School District 18Supreme Court of Missouri · 1977
  3. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. GaleenerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  4. Allen v. CoffelMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Euge v. GoldenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Lincoln Credit Co. v. PeachSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  2. 120 W. FAYETTE STREET, LLLP v. Mayor and City Council of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  3. Westborough Mall, Inc. v. City of Cape GirardeauCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
  4. Harrison v. Monroe CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  5. Westborough Mall, Inc. v. City Of Cape GirardeauCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API