Legal Opinion

Long v. City of Portland

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1908PublishedCited by 51 opinions

From Multnomah: Calvin U. Gantenbein, Judge. This is a suit by George Long, on his own behalf and on behalf of all other residents, citizens, corporations, and taxpayers and all others similarly situated, against the City of Portland. From a decree of dismissal entered after sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Eakin

This is a suit to enjoin the enforcement of a city ordinance of the. City of Portland, pending the submission thereof to a vote of the people by the referendum. On February 26, 1908, an ordinance was enacted by the *94common council of the City of Portland, numbered 17,414, which exacts a license fee for the operation of vehicles, conveyances, and delivery wagons used in the conduct of certain businesses. Within 30 days after the passage of the ordinance a petition invoking a referendum thereon was filed with the auditor of the city; and it is alleged that the city officers are proceeding to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ewing v. HoblitzelleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  2. Reeves v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Kenefick v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Hopping v. Council of City of RichmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. State v. Port of AstoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Monahan v. FunkOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Oakman v. City of EvelethSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  5. Keigley v. Bench, City RecorderUtah Supreme Court · 1939

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API