Legal Opinion
Smith v. Township of Livingston
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided July 31, 1969PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
106 N.J. Super. 444 (1969)
256 A.2d 85
LAWRENCE SMITH, HERMAN ZIEGLER, IRWIN KLEPPER, MARVIN WEINBERGER AND PAUL GOLDMAN, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
THE TOWNSHIP OF LIVINGSTON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWNSHIP OF LIVINGSTON, THE BUILDING INSPECTOR OF THE TOWNSHIP OF LIVINGSTON, N.K. WINSTON CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, AND LIVINGSTON PROPERTIES CORP., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.
Decided July 31, 1969.
Mr. Clive S. Cummis for plaintiffs (Messrs. Cummis, Kent & Radin,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Driscoll v. Burlington-Bristol Bridge Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Hurst v. City of BurlingameCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Two Guys From Harrison, Inc. v. FurmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Ahto v. WeaverSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
- Yanow v. Seven Oaks Park, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- City of Eastlake v. Forest City Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Gumprecht v. City of Coeur D'AleneIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
- TP. OF SPARTA v. SpillaneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
- Smith v. Township of LivingstonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
- Union Cty. Park Comm. v. Cty. of UnionNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.