Legal Opinion

State v. Kinley

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1995No. 93-1708PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

Appellant presents twenty-five propositions of law for our consideration. (See Appendix, infra.) We have considered appellant’s propositions of law and have reviewed the death sentences for appropriateness and proportionality. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals and uphold the sentences of death.

I

Previous cases decided by this court are dispositive of the issues raised in appellant’s fifth, twentieth, twenty-third, twenty-fourth, and twenty-fifth propositions of law. Without further comment, we reject these propositions of law on authority of State v.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. State v. WaddyOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. ApanovitchOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. MorelandOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. PostOhio Supreme Court · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. MadrigalOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. DrummondOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. TibbettsOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. HerringOhio Supreme Court · 2002

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API