State v. Apanovitch
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
We review this case pursuant to R.C. 2929.05(A) as in other cases. We must independently weigh the aggravating circumstances against any mitigating factors. We must also independently consider whether appellant’s death sentence is disproportionate to the penalty in similar cases. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals and uphold the sentence of death.
I
In his first proposition of law, appellant contends that the trial court erred by admitting “state of mind” witnesses to offer hearsay testimony. Appellant also urges that it was error to permit one…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- State v. MaurerOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. JenkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1984
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by439 opinions
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. LottOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. CarterOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. PhillipsOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. LandrumOhio Supreme Court · 1990
434 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.