Legal Opinion
State v. Malcolm
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 21, 2001No. SC 16389PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*655 Opinion
SULLIVAN, J.
The issue in this appeal is whether the trial court improperly granted the defendant’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea, on the grounds that, in accepting the guilty plea, the trial court had failed to mention specifically all three immigration and naturalization consequences listed in General Statutes § 54-lj1 that could result from a guilty plea by a defendant who is not a United States citizen. We reverse the ruling of that court.
On or about December 11,1996, undercover Hamden police officers made arrangements to purchase three ounces of marijuana from someone named…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- People v. Superior Court (Zamudio)California Supreme Court · 2000
- Commonwealth v. LopezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
- Delatorre v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
- State v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. FrancisOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. PeelerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Ajadi v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Briggs v. McWeenySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection & Insurance v. Underwriters at Lloyd's & Companies CollectiveSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.