Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Lopez

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 6, 1998PublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, J.

We transferred this case to this court on our own motion. We consider in this case, and in Commonwealth v. Grant, post 667 (1998), the standards that should govern a judge’s consideration of a defendant’s motion to withdraw a guilty plea under Mass. R. Crim. P. 30 (b), 378 Mass. 900 (1979), when the motion is filed in a sentencing enhancement context and no record of the plea exists because the means of creating that record have been destroyed pursuant to court rule. We conclude that a judge in the Superior Court acted properly when he denied four separate motions by the defendant to withdraw…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Henderson v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Custis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Parke v. RaleySupreme Court of the United States · 1993

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ComitaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  2. Commonwealth v. GoodreauMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  3. Jackson v. CoalterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
  4. Commonwealth v. LucienMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  5. Commonwealth v. WheelerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API