Legal Opinion

Mac Gregor v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1936No. L. A. 15714PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

The jury returned a verdict for plaintiffs in the sum of $4,500 for personal injuries received by plaintiff May Beatrice Mac Gregor when she was struck by an electric train of defendant Pacific Electric Bailway Company. On this appeal from the judgment entered on said verdict, defendant railway company contends that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law.

The accident took place at about 2:30 o ’clock on the afternoon of September 4, 1934. Defendant operates its electric trains on double tracks over its private right of way, which separates the north and south sides…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Choquette v. Key System Transit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
  2. Wilkinson v. United Railroads of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Ferran v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Miller v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Stadler v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rather v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  2. Sexton v. Key System Transit LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Nash v. Fifth AmendmentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. Nash v. Fifth AmendmentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. Burge v. Los Angeles Transit LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API