Legal Opinion
Nash v. Fifth Amendment
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 26, 1991No. A050250PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
228 Cal.App.3d 1106 (1991)
279 Cal. Rptr. 465
JEWELL NASH, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
FIFTH AMENDMENT, Defendant and Respondent.
Docket No. A050250.
Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Four.
March 26, 1991.
COUNSEL
Andrew French Loomis for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Martin, Ryan & Andrada and Glenn Gould for Defendant and Respondent.
OPINION
POCHE, Acting P.J.
A bar charters an excursion ship for the purpose of having a Halloween party. The ship is owned and operated by a common carrier. During the party a passenger is killed by a bullet fired from a handgun which struck the deck after…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Kermarec v. Compagnie Generale TransatlantiqueSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Davidson v. City of WestminsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Tsemetzin v. Coast Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Peterson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Sutherland v. Barclays American/Mortgage Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1997