Legal Opinion
Rather v. City & County of San Francisco
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 30, 1947No. Civ. 13259PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*627GOODELL, J.
Appellant sued for damages for personal injuries. The verdict was in favor of the defendants, and from the judgment entered thereon this appeal was taken.
Appellant, a 10-year-old boy, was struck by a southbound interurban ear of respondent municipality on its San Mateo line at Baden crossing (a signal-stop station) on October 5, 1944, at about 1 p. m., and suffered a fracture of each leg, head injuries and an injury to his right hand.
A northbound car reached Baden crossing shortly before the accident, and its movements bear somewhat on the factors of time and distance in this case.…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Lindemann v. San Joaquin Cotton Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1936
- Palmer v. TschudyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Green v. Los Angeles Terminal Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
- Young v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
- Lafargue v. United Railroad of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Henderson v. Harnischfeger Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Posz v. BurchellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Huggans v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1949
- Mehling v. ZigmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Mumford Ex Rel. Mumford v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1957
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.