Legal Opinion

Wilkinson v. United Railroads of San Francisco

California Supreme Court

Decided December 26, 1924No. Docket No. S.F. 10543PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLawlor, J.

The defendant has appealed from an order of the superior court of the state of California, in and for the county of San Mateo, granting plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, after a verdict by a jury in favor of the defendant in an action brought by the administrator to recover damages for the death of the deceased, Elizabeth G-. Wilkinson, an intestate, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant in operating its interurban railroad between San Francisco and San Mateo.

The complaint alleges that the defendant corporation maintained and operated a double track suburban line…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Richmond & Danville Railroad v. PowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Scott v. San Bernardino Valley Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Mann v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Brumagim v. BradshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  5. Terry v. . JewettNew York Court of Appeals · 1879

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Aydlott v. Key System Transit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Choquette v. Key System Transit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. Livesay v. DeibertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. Rather v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API