New England Savings Bank v. Lopez
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
The principal issue of this appeal is whether General Statutes § 49-28,2 which establishes the procedures governing deficiency judgments following foreclosures by sale, is unconstitutional under the due process clause of the United States constitution because it does not provide an evidentiary hearing to determine the fair market value of the foreclosed property for purposes of calculating the amount of the deficiency. The defendants, Mark Lopez and Pauline J. Henson,3 *273appeal4 from the judgment of the trial court ordering a deficiency. They claim that following the foreclosure sale, the trial…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Brady v. Town of ColchesterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Hamm v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Society for Savings v. Chestnut Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Cahill v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Williams Ford, Inc. v. Hartford Courant Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. KulmacSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Normand Josef Enterprises, Inc. v. Connecticut National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Frillici v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Hopkins v. O'CONNORSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.