Legal Opinion
Dos Santos v. F. D. Rich Construction Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 9, 1995No. 15082PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKatz, J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal from the compensation review board (board) is the meaning of the term “agreement” within the notice requirement for the transfer of liability to the second injury fund (fund) pursuant to General Statutes (Rev. to 1985) § 31-349 of the Workers’ Compensation Act (act).1 The *16defendants2 F. D. Rich Construction Company, Inc. (Rich), and its workers’ compensation insurer, United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company (Fidelity), appeal from the decision of the board affirming the decision of the workers’ compensation commissioner (commissioner) that their…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Mingachos v. CBS, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- American Universal Insurance v. DelGrecoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Sanzone v. Board of Police CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Crochiere v. Board of Education of Town of EnfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- United Illuminating Co. v. GroppoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Dowling v. SlotnikSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Rizzo Pool Co. v. Del GrossoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- State v. DeFrancescoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Duni v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Office of Consumer Counsel v. Department of Public Utility ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.