Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Secreto v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1997No. 1995-1238PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Moyer, C J.

Claimant seeks to compel an award of permanent total disability compensation (“PTD”). The commission seeks to uphold its order denying PTD.

The appropriate standard guiding our review is whether there is “some evidence” in the record to support the commission’s decision. State ex rel. Burley v. Coil Packing, Inc. (1987), 31 Ohio St.3d 18, 31 OBR 70, 508 N.E.2d 936. If so, then the commission will not be deemed to have abused its discretion, and the granting of a writ of mandamus to correct an abuse of discretion is not warranted.

All examining physicians agreed that appellant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Burley v. Coil Packing, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State ex rel. Waddle v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State ex rel. Cordray v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State ex rel. Hartung v. City of ColumbusOhio Supreme Court · 1990

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Avalon Precision Casting Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State ex rel. AutoZone, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State ex rel. Daily Servs., L.L.C. v. Morrison (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State ex rel. Aero Pallets, Inc. v. Bur. of Workers' Comp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023
  5. State ex rel. Daily Servs., L.L.C. v. Morrison (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API