Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Hartung v. City of Columbus

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 12, 1990No. 89-883PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

State, ex rel. Mitchell, v. Robbins & Myers, Inc., supra, held:

“* * * [District hearing officers, as well as regional boards of review and the Industrial Commission, must specifically state which evidence and only that evidence which has been relied upon to reach their conclusion, and a brief explanation stating why the claimant is or is not entitled to the benefits requested.* * *” Id. at 483-484, 6 OBR at 533-534, 453 N.E. 2d at 724.

Appellant contends that the commission abused its discretion by failing to explain why the nonmedical disability factors on which the commission relied did not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Teece v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State ex rel. Burley v. Coil Packing, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State ex rel. Ramirez v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State ex rel. Lawrence v. American Lubricants Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Noll v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State Ex Rel. Speelman v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. State ex rel. Galion Manufacturing Division v. HaygoodOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State ex rel. Mobley v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State ex rel. Mobley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API