Legal Opinion
Ziotas v. Reardon Law Firm, PC
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 8, 2010No. SC 18292PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROGERS, C. J.
The issue raised by this appeal is whether a year-end bonus, the amount of which is discretionary, constitutes wages under General Statutes § 31-71a (3). The plaintiff, Angelo A. Ziotas, brought this action against the defendant, The Reardon Law Firm, P.C., alleging that the defendant had breached an agreement to pay him a year-end bonus and seeking statutory damages under General Statutes § 31-72. The trial court, Corradino, J., granted the defendant’s motion to strike the plaintiffs claim under § 31-72. After the plaintiff filed an amended complaint containing an amended…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Whiting-Turner Contracting Co. v. FitzpatrickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Truelove v. Northeast Capital & Advisory, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2000
- Tianti v. William Raveis Real Estate, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. CookSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Weems v. Citigroup, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Association Resources, Inc. v. WallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Hartford/Windsor Healthcare Properties, LLC v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Murtha v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Raftopol v. RameySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Aqleh v. Cadlerock Joint Venture II, L.P.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.