Legal Opinion

Raftopol v. Ramey

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 5, 2011No. SC 18482PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McLACHLAN, J.

This appeal raises the question of whether Connecticut law permits an intended parent1 who is neither the biological2 nor the adoptive parent of a child to become a legal parent of that child by means of a valid gestational agreement. The use of technology to accomplish reproduction by means other than sexual intercourse no longer may be considered “new” science, and, indeed, the legislature has recognized the validity of such agreements.3 Moreover, no *684one can deny that assisted reproductive technology implicates an essential matter of public policy — it is a basic…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. In re C.K.G.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Matter of Baby M.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  3. Johnson v. CalvertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  5. Carten v. CartenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. David J. Rosecky v. Monica M. SchisselWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Feehan v. MarconeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
  3. Estate of Brooks v. Commissioner of Revenue ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
  4. Nolan v. LaBreeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
  5. GenConn Energy, LLC v. Public Utilities Regulatory AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2024

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API