Legal Opinion

Schaefer v. Lenahan

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 18, 1944No. Civ. 12579PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been received by her when she fell as a result of stepping into a hole in the sidewalk abutting the real property owned, at the time of the accident, by J. W. Lenahan. She named as defendants the city and county of San Francisco, E. J., Mary J. and Thomas J. Burns, the former owners of the property, and J. W. Lenahan. The latter’s demurrer was sustained without leave to amend. From the judgment entered in favor of Lenahan, the plaintiff appeals.

So far as pertinent here, the complaint alleges that on and prior to…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. City of Rochester v. . CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Vinnacombe v. Phila. Am. S.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. Willoughby v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  4. Eustace v. JahnsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Philadelphia v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Peters v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Kopfinger v. Grand Central Public MarketCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Sexton v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Low v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Struzik v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1968

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API