Legal Opinion
Struzik v. City and County of Honolulu
Hawaii Supreme Court
Decided February 21, 1968No. 4572PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
ABE, J.
Plaintiff-appellant stepped into a hole in the unpaved portion of a sidewalk area between the sidewalk and the street curb in the City and County of Honolulu, fell and suffered personal injuries.
She brought this action alleging that the City and County of Honolulu (hereinafter called the “City”), Mr. and Mrs. Toledo and other defendants were under a duty to maintain the sidewalk area in a safe condition and that they negligently allowed a hole or depression to exist therein, as a result of which plaintiff was injured. The presence of other parties to this suit is…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Eric McNello v. John B. Kelly, Inc. v. B. J. Lucarelli and Company, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
- Mitchell v. BranchHawaii Supreme Court · 1961
- Wilson v. American Chain & Cable Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
- Glover v. FongHawaii Supreme Court · 1958
- Schaefer v. LenahanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Turner v. WillisHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
- Fujimoto v. AuHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
- Chung v. Kaonohi Center Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. McNultyHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
- Thomas J. Jones, a Single Man v. Halekulani Hotel, Inc., a Hawaiian Corporation, John Doe and the Xyz Corp., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.