Legal Opinion

Philadelphia v. Reading Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 5, 1928No. Appeal, 211PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Schaffee,

The City of Philadelphia here seeks recovery from the Reading Company of damages which it had to pay to James Brosnalian and Ms mother in a suit which they brought against it for injuries received by James, due to his falling over a hole in the sidewalk of a public street of the city in front of property belonging to the Reading Company. The form of action was assumpsit and the court entered judgment against defendant for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense. It appeals, submitting for our consideration these questions: Can judgment for want of a sufficient…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. McLaughlin v. KellySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  2. Lohr v. Philipsburg BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  3. Orth v. Consumers Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Dutton v. Lansdowne BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  5. Mintzer v. GreenoughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Neville Chemical Company v. Union Carbide CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  2. Brown v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Vinnacombe v. Phila. Am. S.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. Fleischman v. ReadingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  5. Neville Chemical Company v. Union Carbide CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1968

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API