Eustace v. Jahns
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of the Twelfth District, City and County of San Francisco. The defendant appealed. The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtSprague, J.
This is an action against Carl Jahns, as administrator of the estate of Herman Schroeder, deceased, to recover damages for personal injuries, alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff, in consequence of the neglect of the defendant to keep in proper repair a portion of a public street in the City and County of San Francisco, upon which fronted a lot *12of ground belonging to his testator, and of which, as such administrator, he was in possession by his tenants. The prayer of the complaint is “for judgment against Carl Jahns, administrator as aforesaid, for the sum of $7,500, for costs of suit,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. GibbsNew York Supreme Court · 1832
3Cited by53 opinions
- City of Rochester v. . CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Johnston v. LongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Schaefer v. LenahanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Sterrett v. BarkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Selby v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1886
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.