Legal Opinion
Talasila, Inc., and M.R. Mikkilineni v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided February 16, 2001No. 00-5134PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Per curiam
M.R. Mikkilineni appeals from the order of the United States Court of Federal Claims that dismissed his complaint without prejudice for failure to comply with Rule 81(d)(8) of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims. Talasila, Inc. v. United States, No. 97-439 C (Fed.Cl. Aug. 17, 2000) (order) (“Talasila”). We affirm.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs Talasila, Inc. and M.R. Mikkili-neni filed a complaint against the United States in the Court of Federal Claims on June 24, 1997. The complaint alleged that the United States had improperly terminated for default a contract with Talasila and sought in excess…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Rowland v. California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Advisory CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- H.B. Mac, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Richdel, Inc. v. Sunspool CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Burkburnett Refining Co. v. IlsengTexas Supreme Court · 1927
- Finast Metal Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Curtis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Alli v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Vincent Schickler, TMD U.S.A., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Hutchens v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Balbach v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.