Legal Opinion
Richdel, Inc. v. Sunspool Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided February 17, 1983No. Appeal 83-611PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
This is a request by Harry T. Whitehouse, the president of appellee, Sunspool Corporation, to represent his corporation, which is the appellee in this patent case. Mr. White-house apparently is not a lawyer. He seeks to represent his corporation because “[t]he continuing accrual of professional fees ... has imposed a substantial financial hardship upon the Appellee.”
Rule 7(a) of the Rules of this court provides that “[ejxcept for an individual appearing pro se, each party and amicus curiae must appear through an attorney who is authorized to practice before this court.” Nothing in our…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Southwest Express Co., Inc. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Algonac Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
- Roger & Gallet v. Janmarie, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
4Cited by21 opinions
- Rowland v. California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Advisory CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Jones v. Niagara Frontier Transportation AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Expressway Associates II v. Friendly Ice Cream Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Talasila, Inc., and M.R. Mikkilineni v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Finast Metal Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.