Hutchens v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MILLER, Judge.
This case is before the court on Defendant’s Motion To Strike or, in the Alternative, To Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint. Plaintiffs Hutchens and Arman filed their original complaint on April 6, 2009, and their first amended complaint on May 7, 2009. A second amended complaint was filed on behalf of Messrs. Hutchens and Arman and newly added plaintiff Iron Mountain Mines, Inc., on June 11, 2009. In their second amended complaint, plaintiffs allege that remedial actions of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”)…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Bussie v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Shelkofsky v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Arbelaez v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Rivera v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Alli v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.