Legal Opinion
Finast Metal Products, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided August 4, 1987No. 554-80CPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*760Order (i) Denying Motion for Substitution Pursuant to Rule 25, and (ii) Conditionally Directing Dismissal Of Complaint With Prejudice
WIESE, Judge.
I
On January 7, 1977, the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (the “board”) entered a decision denying an appeal by Finast Metal Products, Inc. (“Finast”) of the default termination of its contract for the manufacture of 60 mm mortar projectiles. Finast Metal Products, Inc., 77-1 B.C.A. (CCH) ¶ 12,331. A complaint seeking review of that decision under the standards of the Wunderlich Act, 41 U.S.C. §§ 321-322 (1982), was filed in the Court of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- United States v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Frank Palazzo v. Gulf Oil Corporation, a Pennsylvania CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. Forty-One Thirty-Six Wilcox Bldg. Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- National Independent Theatre Exhibitors, Inc., James T. Patterson, Sr., Screen Advertising Film Fund, Inc. v. Buena Vista Distribution CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Talasila, Inc., and M.R. Mikkilineni v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Alli v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Rochester v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Affourtit v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Lea v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.