People v. Mendoza
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McKINSTER, J.
Defendant and appellant Kimberly Mendoza admitted alleged violations of probation and the trial court continued her on probation. Defendant appealed, requesting a certificate of probable cause to challenge the validity of the plea/admission and continuation on probation. Defendant contends that the trial court failed to act on a demand for sentencing (Pen. Code, § 1203.2a) she had filed several months earlier, and the trial court therefore lacked jurisdiction to rule on the violation of probation allegations, or to impose sentence or reinstate probation. We reverse, and…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Burden v. SnowdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Bodinson Manufacturing Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- People v. CoronadoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Torres v. Automobile Club of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. Steward, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- People v. CarranzaAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2016
- People v. CarranzaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- People v. Garda CA2/4California Court of Appeal · 2015
- People v. GonzalezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.