Legal Opinion

People v. Carranza

Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California

Decided November 28, 2016No. BR052691PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RICCIARDULLI, Acting P. J.—

I. INTRODUCTION

The trial courts in these consolidated appeals applied defendants’ custody credits to the total fines imposed, which included base fines and penalty assessments, rather than solely to the base fines. This resulted in defendants owing greater amounts, and requiring they spend more time in custody and perform more community service, to satisfy their fines than if the courts had applied their credits only toward the base fines. As discussed below, we reverse and remand for recalculation of the credits.

Assembly Bill No. 1375 (2015-2016 Reg. Sess.)…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. In Re EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. In Re LynchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Ginns v. SavageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. MonkCalifornia Superior Court · 2018
  2. People v. MonkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API