Torres v. Automobile Club of Southern California
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BAXTER, J.
Civil Code section 3295, subdivision (d), 1 provides in pertinent part that a court “shall, on application of any defendant, preclude the admission of evidence of that defendant’s profits or financial condition until after the trier of fact returns a verdict for plaintiff awarding actual damages and finds that a defendant is guilty of malice, oppression, or fraud in accordance with Section ,3294. Evidence of profit and financial condition shall be presented to the same trier of fact that found for the plaintiff and found one or more defendants guilty of malice, oppression, or…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- College Hospital, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Adams v. MurakamiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Theodor v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Day v. City of FontanaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Lewis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Hunt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Campbell v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Bullock v. Phillip Morris USA, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.