Legal Opinion

Kayfetz v. State of California

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 29, 1984No. A020795PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WHITE, P. J.

Appellant Daniel O. Kayfetz, M.D., sued the State of California, the Board of Medical Quality Assurance (Board), the Physicians Diversion Program, and the diversion program administrator, Jerome S. Becker, for damages arising from publication of disciplinary action against him in the official “Action Report” which is distributed to hospitals and doctors. Kayfetz alleges that the published report was inaccurate and violated promised confidentiality concerning his participation in the Diversion Program for Impaired Physicians, a drug rehabilitation program.

The trial court…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Hardy v. VialCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Kachig v. BootheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. Baillargeon v. Dep't of Water & Power of L.A.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. Sobey v. MolonyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Detrice Garmon v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. Kemmerer v. County of FresnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  3. Javor v. TaggartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. Ingram v. FlippoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. Randle v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API