Legal Opinion
Detrice Garmon v. County of Los Angeles
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 5, 2016No. 12-55109PublishedCited by 218 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WILKEN, Senior District Judge:
Plaintiff-Appellant Detrice Garmon was an alibi witness in her son’s murder trial. 1 Because she was scheduled to undergo brain surgery with an uncertain outcome, her deposition was taken pursuant to state court procedure. She authorized Defendant-Appellee Southern California Perma-nente Medical Group (“Kaiser”) to disclose to the prosecution medical records related to her brain tumor. The next day, Defendant-Appellee Los Angeles County Deputy District Attorney Michele Hanisee, the lead prosecutor, issued a subpoena duces tecum to Kaiser instead requesting…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Michael Henry Ferdik v. Joe Bonzelet, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by218 opinions
- Marroquin v. Pfizer, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2019
- Deerpoint Grp., Inc. v. Agrigenix, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2018
- Ralls v. FacebookDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2016
- United States v. Jayde EvansCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Grant v. AlperovichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
213 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.