Legal Opinion
Ingram v. Flippo
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 17, 1999No. H018406PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BAMATTRE-MANOUKIAN, J.
Candace Ingram, a member of a local school board, filed suit against Dean Flippo, the District Attorney of Monterey County (the District Attorney), and Monterey County (the County), seeking declaratory and injunctive relief under California’s “Open Meeting Law,” the Ralph M. Brown Act (hereafter the Brown Act, or the Act). (Gov. Code, § 54950 et seq.) The allegations of the complaint stemmed from statements made in a press release by the District Attorney that there had been minor violations of the Brown Act by several board members. Ingram disagreed with the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Buckley v. FitzsimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Sacramento Newspaper Guild, Local 92 v. Sacramento County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- CAMSI IV v. Hunter Technology Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1991
- Kilgore v. YoungerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Ovando v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Align Technology, Inc. v. TranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Trujillo v. City of OntarioDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2006
- County of Los Angeles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Garcia v. City of MercedDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2008
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.