Legal Opinion
Randle v. City and County of San Francisco
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 16, 1986No. A024177PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KLINE, P. J.
Raymond Randle, Jr., brought a civil action against respondents City and County of San Francisco (hereinafter City), Assistant District Attorney William Fazio, and Police Inspector Martin Bastiani, seeking damages for injuries resulting from respondents’ alleged suppression of exculpatory evidence during appellant’s prosecution for rape. The trial court sustained without leave to amend respondents’ demurrer to appellant’s amended complaint, except as to a single cause of action against the City, and this appeal followed.
Statement of Facts
A demurrer admits all material and…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gomez v. ToledoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Owen v. City of IndependenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Asgari v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Inman v. AndersonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Trujillo v. City of OntarioDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2006
- County of Los Angeles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Garcia v. City of MercedDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2008
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.