Legal Opinion

Hoke v. Applegate

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1884No. 9942PublishedCited by 13 opinions

From the Harrison Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Bioknell, C. C.

This was an action of replevin by the appellee, as guardian of a person of unsound mind, against *571Cornelius R. Hoke and Lavina, his wife; it was commenced in February, 1880, and was tried at November term, 1880.

There was a finding by the court for the defendant Cornelius and against the defendant Lavina, with one cent damages, and that the value of the property was $5,-514, and- that she had the same in her possession and fraudulently concealed it, and that the plaintiff was entitled to an execution against the body of said Lavina unless she would forthwith surrender said…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Haymond v. SaucerIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Lake Erie & Western Railway Co. v. KinseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Higgins v. KendallIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Trammel v. ChipmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Hardenbrook v. SherwoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1880

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. McFadden v. RossIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Boswell v. First National Bank of LaramieWyoming Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Chapell v. ShueeIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Brickley v. EdwardsIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Chaplin v. SullivanIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API