Legal Opinion
McFadden v. Ross
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided September 14, 1886No. 11,031PublishedCited by 46 opinions
From the Shelby Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
Ross and Stumph sued McFadden and Miller on a replevin bond. They charged in their complaint that on the 26th day of March, 1880, they were the owners .and in possession of certain personal property of the value •of $401.90, and that on that day McFadden, as administrator of the estate of Joseph Nichols, deceased, claiming to be entitled to the possession of the property, instituted a suit in replevin against them in the Shelby Circuit Court, for the recovery of the property described.
It is averred in the complaint that the property was seized by the sheriff upon a writ duly issued at the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Russell v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Davis v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Wood v. Jackson ex dem. GenetCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1829
- Campbell v. . ConsalusNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Sache v. WallaceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Wayne Pike Co. v. HammonsIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Jones v. VertIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Miller v. ProutIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
- People's Savings, Loan & Building Ass'n v. SpearsIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.