Higgins v. Kendall
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Shelby Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtWoods, J.
— Suit by the appellee against the appellants, to-enforce a vendor’s hen and to recover judgment upon a promissory note made by the appellant Samuel Higgins. The original complaint was against said Samuel and his wife and co-appellant, Eebeeca, but on leave of the court an “additional complaint,” in two paragraphs, was filed, wherein said Martin, who had purchased the land upon which the lien was claimed, was made a party defendant, and, issues, of fact having been joined upon the complaint, the plaintiff thereafter filed a supplemental complaint, in one paragraph, to which the defendants…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Caress v. FosterIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- Rhodes v. GreenIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
- Amory v. ReillyIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
- Smith v. FreemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Walker v. CoxIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. CreekIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Buchanan v. Berkshire Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- Shoner v. Pennsylvania Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- McCoy v. Kokomo Railway & Light Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1902
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.