Legal Opinion

Higgins v. Kendall

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1881No. 7458PublishedCited by 28 opinions

From the Shelby Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWoods, J.

— Suit by the appellee against the appellants, to-enforce a vendor’s hen and to recover judgment upon a promissory note made by the appellant Samuel Higgins. The original complaint was against said Samuel and his wife and co-appellant, Eebeeca, but on leave of the court an “additional complaint,” in two paragraphs, was filed, wherein said Martin, who had purchased the land upon which the lien was claimed, was made a party defendant, and, issues, of fact having been joined upon the complaint, the plaintiff thereafter filed a supplemental complaint, in one paragraph, to which the defendants…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Caress v. FosterIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Rhodes v. GreenIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Amory v. ReillyIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
  4. Smith v. FreemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Walker v. CoxIndiana Supreme Court · 1865

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. CreekIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Buchanan v. Berkshire Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Shoner v. Pennsylvania Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. McCoy v. Kokomo Railway & Light Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1902

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API