Legal Opinion

Chaplin v. Sullivan

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1891No. 14,778PublishedCited by 12 opinions

From the Madison Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcBride, J.

John Chaplin died intestate, in Madison county, owning certain lands in that county. He left surviving him, as his sole heirs, a widow, six living children, and the heirs of a deceased daughter. Appellant Solomon C. Chaplin is one of the children, and was appointed administrator of the estate.

Appellant Caroline Gillett and the appellee, Emma Sullivan, are daughters of said decedent. Solomon C. executed to them a mortgage on his undivided interest in said land, *51to secure to each the sum of $350, loaned him by each, both being secured by the same mortgage.

The widow had partition of the land,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Stiger v. BentIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Muir v. BerkshireIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Weiss v. GuerineauIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Binford v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Goodall v. MopleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1873

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Stone v. ElliottIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Richardson v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Waterbury v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. Davis v. SchlemmerIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Moore v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1900

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API