Legal Opinion
Haymond v. Saucer
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided May 15, 1882No. 9030PublishedCited by 45 opinions
From the Shelby Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtWoods, J.
Breach of promise to marryjudgment against the defendant, who appeals.
The first and second specifications, of error are not available. The sufficiency of a separate paragraph of complaint, which contains more than one paragraph, can not be brought in question by an assignment that the paragraph does not state facts sufficient. It is the entire complaint only which can be questioned in that way. Trammel v. Chipman, 74 Ind. 474.
The third specification is upon the overruling of the motion in arrest. This presents the question Avhether either of the paragraphs of the complaint states facts…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Kniffen v. . McConnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
- Kelley v. RileyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- American Express Co. v. PattersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Thorn v. . KnappNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
- Southard v. RexfordNew York Supreme Court · 1826
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Powell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Charlie Stuart Oldsmobile, Inc. v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Coleman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Gunder v. TibbitsIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
- Standley v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.