Wellinger v. Brackenridge Borough
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Cunningham, J.,
The judgment in this workmen’s compensation case, entered by the court below in favor of the claimant and in direct conflict with the findings of fact of the board, must be reversed because in so doing the judges of the common pleas not only ignored the applicable principles of law but also, in effect, usurped the functions and powers exclusively vested in the compensation authorities by undertaking to pass upon the credibility of witnesses, weigh the evidence, and substitute their own findings of fact for those of the board.
About 9:30 o’clock in the forenoon of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Watkins v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Ford v. A. E. Dick Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Hunter v. American Oil Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Franks v. Point Marion Bridge Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Podgur v. Otto Eisenlohr & Bros.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Messikomer v. Baldwin Locomotive WorksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Roberts, Admrx. v. J. WanamakerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Garcia v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Garcia v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983