Watkins v. Prudential Insurance
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Maxey,
The question here is whether or not in an action on an insurance policy, the so-called “presumption against suicide” can take the place of evidence of accidental death in sustaining an averment of death “effected solely through external, violent and accidental means.”
On June 3, 1924, Norman C. Watkins obtained a policy of insurance from the appellant company in which the latter agreed to pay the insured’s wife, Elizabeth M. Watkins, the sum of $20,000 upon receipt of due proof of the death of the insured during the continuance of the policy. It also agreed to pay…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Agnew v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Mockowik v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
- Home Benefit Assn. v. SargentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Whitlatch v. . Fidelity and Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. SiefkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by187 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Batts, Q., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Virginia J. Barry Melville v. American Home Assurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- In Re Custody of HernandezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. BonomoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Greene v. Oliver Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
182 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.