Legal Opinion

Podgur v. Otto Eisenlohr & Bros.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 14, 1939No. Appeal, 96PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, J.,

Claimant, on behalf of herself and three minor children, filed a claim petition for compensation for the death of her husband who was a salesman for defendant employer. The petition set forth that deceased died on December 14, 1937, as the result of an accident occurring in the course of his employment. In its answer defendant employer denied this averment. Before the referee claimant established that deceased died of carbon monoxide poison, on December 14, 1937, on the premises of defendant employer, and while engaged upon the business of his employer. Witnesses called…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Paulin v. Williams Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Paulin v. Williams Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Tappato v. Teplick & Eisenberg Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Franks v. Point Marion Bridge Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wolfingbarger v. Addressograph-Multigraph Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. Hunter v. American Oil Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Hadfield v. American Society of Composers, Authors & PublishersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. Walden v. Williams Bros.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  5. Brecker v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API