Legal Opinion

Frank v. Department of Licensing

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 16, 1999No. 17127-2-IIIPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchultheis, C.J.

— The “implied consent” statute, RCW 46.20.308, requires police officers to send a signed report of refusal to the Department of Licensing (DOL) within 72 hours after a suspected drunk driver refuses to submit to a breath test. Upon receipt of the report, the DOL revokes the driver’s license for a period. RCW 46.20.308(7); .311. The signed report of Lee Frank’s refusal to submit to a breath test was not date-stamped. He appeals the revocation of his driver’s license, contending the statutory time limit is a jurisdictional prerequisite to the DOL’s authority to revoke his license. We disagree…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. KrallWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. Board of Yakima County CommissionersWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. BostromWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. StorhoffWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. StorhoffWashington Supreme Court · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kappelman v. LutzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  2. Maplewood Estates, Inc. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  3. Department of Labor & Industries v. DeLozierCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  4. Earl Soushek v. Department Of LicensingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  5. Joshua C. Smith, V. State Of Wa., Dept Of LicensingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API