Legal Opinion

Kappelman v. Lutz

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 6, 2007No. 24981-6-IIIPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

170 P.3d 1189 (2007)

Amber L. KAPPELMAN, Appellant,

v.

Theodore J. LUTZ, Respondent.

No. 24981-6-III.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3.

November 6, 2007.

Gordon Thomas Carey Jr., Attorney at Law, Portland, OR, for Appellant.

Jackson H. Welch, Duggan, Schlotfeldt & Welch PLLC, Vancouver, WA, for Respondent.

SWEENEY, C.J.

¶ 1 The decision by a trial judge to exclude evidence is a decision vested in the discretion of the trial judge, not us. And we will overturn that decision only when we conclude that the trial judge has abused his or her discretion by refusing to admit the evidence. Here, the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Brown v. Spokane County Fire Protection District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Weyerhaeuser v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. TS v. Boy Scouts of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  4. T.S. v. Boy Scouts of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Mathis v. AmmonsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kappelman v. LutzWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Veridian Credit Union v. Eddie Bauer, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2017
  3. Kappelman v. LutzWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Collins v. Clark County Fire District No. 5Court of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  5. Schmidt v. CooganWashington Supreme Court · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API