Legal Opinion
State v. Storhoff
Washington Supreme Court
Decided November 13, 1997No. 64860-3PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
946 P.2d 783 (1997)
133 Wash.2d 523
The STATE of Washington, Petitioner,
v.
Douglas STORHOFF, Respondent.
The STATE of Washington, Petitioner,
v.
Virgil TUCKER, Respondent.
The STATE of Washington, Petitioner,
v.
Jeffrey S. OROPESA, Respondent.
No. 64860-3.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
Argued May 27, 1997.
Decided November 13, 1997.
Russell Hauge, Kitsap County Prosecutor, Pamela B. Loginsky, Deputy, Port Orchard, for petitioner.
Crawford, McGilliard & Peterson, David R. Johnson, Port Orchard, for respondent.
DURHAM, Chief Justice.
Habitual traffic offenders Douglas Storhoff, Virgil Tucker, and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Grannis v. OrdeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Gonzales v. Department of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. Whitman County District CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- Thompson v. Department of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Thompson v. State Dept. of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Motley-Motley, Inc. v. Pollution Control Hearings BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.