Legal Opinion
Mylan Laboratories, Inc. v. Matkari
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided October 18, 1993No. 93-1041PublishedCited by 197 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff-appellant Mylan Laboratories, Inc. (“Mylan”) has appealed the dismissal of its Third Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). The district court dismissed all of Mylan’s claims with prejudice.
On appeal, Mylan has maintained that its Third Amended Complaint was sufficient to survive the Rule 12(b)(6) stage. Specifically, Mylan has asserted that it properly alleged numerous violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. § 1961 et seq., several claims…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Castrol Inc. v. Pennzoil Company and Pennzoil Products CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Mylan Laboratories, Inc. v. Akzo, N.V.District Court, D. Maryland · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by197 opinions
- Edwin P. Harrison, and United States of America, Party in Interest v. Westinghouse Savannah River CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Tyrone Andrews v. J. M. Daw, in His Individual CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- Stratagene v. Parsons Behle & LatimerDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2004
- Tamara Moore v. Mars Petcare US, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Robert Perez v. Nidek Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
192 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.