Legal Opinion
Stratagene v. Parsons Behle & Latimer
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided April 29, 2004No. CIV.A.DKC 2003-1703PublishedCited by 223 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CHASANOW, District Judge.
Presently pending and ready for resolution in this legal malpractice case is the motion by Defendants Parsons Behle & Latimer (Parsons) and the named individual attorneys to dismiss or, in the alternative, to transfer venue. The issues have been fully briefed and the court now rules, no hearing being deemed necessary. Local Rule 105.6. For the reasons that follow, the court will grant the motion to dismiss as to the law firm and attorneys Roche and Wikstrom, and will deny the motion as to attorney Pierce.
I. Background
Plaintiff Stratagene is engaged…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by223 opinions
- Structural Preservation Systems, LLC v. AndrewsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- Cook v. Nationwide InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- Abburi v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration ServicesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2021
- Abburu v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration ServicesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2021
- Abdul v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration ServicesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2021
218 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.